🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law stated he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. This production, though, may align too neatly with the carefully constructed image promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Strongman

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and the country's pop-culture machine have worked together to forge a tailor-made persona of the president. This figure is a political superhero devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a TV series launched last fall, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “save” the nation from disorder. Although the character's name a different name, the implication is clear: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this identical story instead of debunking it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to undermine the Putin cult by framing him as a symptom but as a symptom, shifting the focus to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, Putin is presented as having been chosen by influential figures to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to become president. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, seeking permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. In reality, these events ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody actually pleaded with him to take the job. The presidency was effectively a casting call with no shortage of candidates. At the centre to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country de facto.

• The shortlist featured various figures, among them an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• According to an expert who studied his rise, the chosen candidate simply fitted the necessary criteria: obedient, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A businessman close to the process stated the primary requirement was controllability and loyalty, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the image of him as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his clandestine activities in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not engaged in field operations.

Interestingly, the move to framing him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s debut as 007. His harder version led local outlets and social media to make comparisons with their leader. Edited images replacing the actor's likeness with Putin’s appeared on Moscow streets, fueling the increasing trend to see him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or key figures from its narrative, despite covering recent years, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is often an all-powerful presence who remains unseen directly. He is hinted at through portraits or orders from on high. Now, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it might seek to examine.