🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart nuclear discussions with the United States provided that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared only diplomacy produced results, and revealed new appeals had been made by intermediaries to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to access attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Navigating a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is walking a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be proceeding from a situation of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged stronger defensively and mentally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium within its borders that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Previous Discussions Abruptly Concluded

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious end on 12 June when Israel, with US support, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that ended with the American leader declaring the facilities had been eliminated. Following this, European countries exercised their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Representatives stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Position

Iranian officials stated the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in some form if talks reopen.

The US president last week claimed he had been getting signals that Iran desired to resume discussions, but confidentially Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from the United States either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a show.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his address to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a dominant force that exploits the notion of international law, the foreign minister stated the 12-day war demonstrated the clash could not be settled by military means. He asserted the strikes commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were carried out with full US knowledge and collaboration, making faith hard to reestablish.

Diplomacy Stays the Final Answer

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had always attempted to impose their will during the talks. Dialogue can still be viable and remains the ultimate resolution to address conflicts, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be followed."

"If they address to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the same language."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the conflict of repair and recovery, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have discovered our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this war. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The installations and machinery, if destroyed, will be restored; what is important is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have grown more resilient, more united, and more endorsing of the government and the nation in the face of this attack."